Letters to the Editor and Responses to Issues in the News

NEW YORK POST PAGE 6

MEDIA WATCH
A family is grieving so you choose an antireligious campaigner as a “source” on this family and their beliefs. Your piece is a non-sequitur of the basest order. The words “obscene” and “repugnant” also come to mind.
MEDIA WATCH
There you are. Passing on the blatant hate speech of an “anonymous source” in an effort to slander an entire religious group. You should be ashamed.
MEDIA WATCH
Since when does the press rely on such baseless, bigoted data? If it does, it deserves only one place in this society: the garbage can.
MEDIA WATCH
As our entire nation pauses to declare “enough is enough” when it comes to bigotry, the New York Post proudly flaunts it while a family grieves.
MEDIA WATCH
In what world is it acceptable behavior to slander an entire religion, based on dubious hearsay, in the hours immediately following a horrific family tragedy?
MEDIA WATCH
The religious contempt you expressed in your article headline is such blatant bigotry. Couching it in “One wonders whether the backlash will affect Moss’s chances on Emmy night” outs your actual intent. I am frankly shocked.
TAKE ACTION
COMBAT HATE & DISCRIMINATION
If you have been the victim of an incident of antireligious hate or discrimination, report it here.
REPORT HERE
CHAMPION FREEDOM OF RELIGION
Freedom of religion or belief is a fundamental right of every human being. Help make it a reality.
SPREAD THE WORD
DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY
Fight for honest journalism and demand advertisers stop funding hate.
MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD